[asapmembers] Fwd: Arecibo Science Advocacy Partnership August 2012 Member Newsletter
Joanna Rankin
secretary at areciboscience.org
Mon Aug 20 18:11:56 UTC 2012
Dear ASAP Member,
The NAIC Arecibo Managing Partners (AMP) has now been in full charge
of the
Observatory since October 1 last year. They clearly have had their
work cut out
for them, and the ASAP Board has tried to follow events and progress
especially
closely during this period. Indeed, this management transition seems
to have been
unparalleled even in NSF experience, both in terms of the three-
partner structure
and the need to restructure so much to conform the AMP procedures and
business
protocols after almost five decades of Cornell administration.
Overall, the ASAP Board believes that the transition has been
successful. Proposal
and scheduling cycles have proceeded seamlessly for the users, though
changes
in these procedures are forthcoming, as discussed below. It is a great
benefit to the
facility that most staff, apart from a few retirements, have been able
to remain in the
employment of the Observatory. Though we do not know the details, AMP
has been
working on benefits packages and has been trying to make them as
consistent as
possible for those employed by each of the partners. We were happy to
learn that
the long hiatus on hiring new AO staff is now at an end, and in
particular Prakash
Atreya has joined the NAIC Computer Department to fill the long vacant
telescope
systems specialist position.
NSF AST Portfolio Review (PR). The Cornell flag had hardly been
lowered when
NSF Astronomy announced its new "Portfolio Review" of NSF AST
facilities, and the
ASAP Board was asked to prepare scientific "white papers" for
submission to the PR.
Ten "white papers" were prepared by different Board members over the
turn of the
year and submitted by the January 31 deadline. The ASAP board, with
the rest of the
astronomical community, is awaiting the release of the Portfolio
Review report and
the response from NSF-AST later this year. We believe that advocacy
for high-quality
science remains important in this and any community review process.
BREAKING NEWS: The NSF AST Portfolio Report has just been released,
and AO
seems to have come off relatively well. The ASAP Board is meeting
this week in an
emergency session to assess the import of the Report and formulate its
responses.
Another Member Newsletter with the PR as its major subject will be
coming shortly.
NAIC Science and Management Committee (SMAC). In February, NAIC
Director
Bob Kerr requested that ASAP nominate two candidates to the new NAIC
SMAC
—the AMP’s replacement for the old Visiting Committee—and that one be an
astronomer and the other an atmospheric scientist. The ASAP Board
determined
that SMAC nominees should be ASAP Board members, either as current Board
members or by election to the Board. The Bylaws were then revised to
reflect this
decision and experienced nominees sought urgently to comply with
Kerr’s tight
schedule for forming the SMAC. Fortunately, both Frank Djuth and
David Nice
agreed to be nominated to the SMAC, the latter by first being elected
to the ASAP
Board. As of Newsletter publication time the Board has heard nothing
more on the
SMAC appointments.
“Re-Inventing Arecibo” Workshop. The two-day meeting was held at the
prestigious
El Convento Hotel on the island of Old San Juan a stone’s throw from
El Morro and
near to the Puerto Rican Legislature and the Governor’s residence, La
Forteleza.
Deputy Director of NAIC, Juan Arratia of UMET (Universidad
Metropolitana, an AMP
partner) organized the meeting under the leadership and sponsorship of
NSF AGM
NAIC Program Manager Bob Robinson. The first day was well attended
and surely
was the most Puerto Rican event concerning the Observatory that any of
us had ever
attended. The highest official of the Puerto Rican government to
attend was Victor
Rivera Castro of PRIDCO (Puerto Rican Industrial Development
Company). However,
there was a substantial participation by PR university chancellors and
others from
island universities as well as participants from Spain and Latin
America. Five ASAP
Board members participated (Carlson, Mathews, Rankin, and Werthimer—as
well
as Rick Jenet who had recently cycled off the Board). The first day
was opened by
NSF AST Director Jim Ulvestad, Bob Robinson and Bob Kerr as well as UMET
Chancellor Federico Matheu. Most of the first day talks that followed
focused on
AO’s strengths and contributions or on possible areas of collaboration
in a variety
of areas. John Mathews proposed putting AO at the center of a new
institute he
called PRIAS (PR Institute for Advanced Studies), that would award
PhDs and that
would have faculty and students distributed around the world. The
first day ended
with a panel discussion of PR university chancellors, who reported on
their joint work
through a number of meetings and committees to find ways to interact
with and support
the Observatory. The breaks and meals of the Workshop on the first
day kept participants
together in the hotel, so there was good opportunity to meet the other
participants, a
number for the first time. Unfortunately, there was limited AO staff
participation. The
second day was more focused on practical ideas for finding new revenue
sources for
the Observatory. Among these, however, were several people with
strong ideas and
many suggestions. These included those given by Kathy Olsen, formerly
of the NSF,
as well as Louis Duncan, now President of Rollins College. Olsen,
Duncan, Mathews,
and Rafael Rodrigo (AO visiting scholar) comprised the panel that
closed the second
day with open discussion on the various ideas raised by participants
earlier. The third
day gave the participants opportunity to visit the Observatory.
Overall, the meeting was pronounced a success by Bob Robinson although
he expressed
his disappointment that no one had come to the meeting with “pockets
full of money”. The
spirit of the meeting was positive and upbeat. Although new
directions and revenue
sources are needed to assemble a fully adequate level of support, at
the same time it was
clear that NAIC could and would be judicious so as to avoid
undermining its fundamental
capabilities and mission. There were no reports or undercurrents of
leftover business from
the transition to SRI management; rather, the implication was that the
transition had largely
been finished and finished reasonably well, such that the Workshop
could now focus on
future possibilities and needs. Appreciation to Cornell was expressed
in strong terms at
various points by Bob Kerr and other members of the new management team
—that CU and
Don Campbell in particular had been constructive and cooperative—so it
seems that this
area of potential awkwardness has also been negotiated successfully.
In other news, we
had the opportunity to meet the new NSF AST NAIC Program Manager, Eric
Bloemhof.
Zavin Arzoumanian also confirmed that he was stepping down as the AO
Astronomy head
and Fernando Camilo, then at Columbia University, would be phasing
into the position over
a four-month interval during which the responsibility will be shared.
AO Astronomy Head and Proposal System. Fernando Camilo has now assumed
the
Astronomy Directorship position and Zaven Arzoumanian has stepped
down, with emails
from both addressing the AO user community in early July. Of
particular importance to ASAP
members is Fernando’s call for “more regular and substantive
communication” from the users.
Let us take advantage of this opportunity to stay in communication,
particularly when solicited
for feedback on specific items; we should feel free to ask questions,
but also be conscientious
about answering queries.
Proposal reviewers and PIs of large ongoing proposals have already
been contacted for their
feedback on changes to the proposal system, and a general announcement
has now been
released (see attached) with the plan to redefine the proposal grades
and to fold all proposals
(large and small) into a common peer review, with proposals
resubmitted every semester or
every year. As a result, the Observatory will be seeking to expand
and diversify the reviewer
pool. ASAP members should consider nominating colleagues who would
serve well in this
capacity, for there may also soon be a call for reviewer nominations.
Other News. Arecibo is a crucial observatory to work on the
overarching themes outlined in
the Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, New Worlds, New
Horizons in Astronomy
and Astrophysics. Examples of ongoing Arecibo programs highlighted
in the decadal survey
include the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational
Waves (NANOGrav), a
project with the potential to add to Arecibo’s unique heritage of
conducting exquisite precision
timing experiments to test the Einstein's General Theory of
Relativity. Time domain astronomy
is another arena identified by the Decadal Survey where Arecibo’s
capabilities offer a unique
advantage. Looking to the future, surveys with the planned Arecibo 40-
Beam Array would
have unparalleled sensitivity and survey speed in mapping Galactic and
extragalactic HI and
should play a pivotal role in addressing some of the key questions
identified in the Decadal
Survey.
Arecibo is also planning to develop, or in the middle of developing, a
myriad of new instruments
and associated digital backends, including a new radar backend
processor, Mark 5C VLBI data
recorder, the PUPPI pulsar machine (commissioning is underway), a new
wide band IF/LO
distribution system, the 12 meter antenna and associated
instrumentation, and two new wide
band receivers and their backends.
ASAP Board Election. The ASAP Board is seeking nominations for new
Board members.
If you are interested in serving as a Board member, or would like to
nominate an Arecibo-
interested colleague, please send your nominations to board at areciboscience.org
by the
first week of September. Four three-year Board positions will be open.
ASAP membership recruitment. We take this opportunity to remind you
that ASAP is influential
in direct proportion to its body of members. At this promising and
very challenging point for the
Observatory, however, ASAP needs to increase its membership to about
250 colleagues to
support its work. Building this new membership will now be much
easier, because ASAP
membership is now completely open to those interested in AO science—
that is, theorists, users
or appreciators. The Board has taken the position that renewed
financial support will not be
requested from existing members at this time, although such
contributions are always welcome.
However, the support of new members remains an essential source of
funding for ASAP operation.
Please then assist us in building the ASAP membership by approaching
your own colleagues—
especially those outside the immediate community of AO users—using the
brochure as needed.
If the current members were to bring in but one new member, ASAP would
more than meet this
crucial goal easily.
Finally, the Board wants to take this opportunity to encourage members
to email us with suggestions,
help build the membership or assist with ASAP's work in future. For
instance, you may be an expert
on aspects of AO's scientific excellence and uniqueness that are not
now well described on the
ASAP website; if so, please consider writing up a short piece (a "one-
pager") for this purpose.
Sincere thanks from the ASAP Board for your absolutely essential
support at members.
With best wishes to you and for a vital Arecibo future,
The ASAP Board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://areciboscience.org/pipermail/asapmembers_areciboscience.org/attachments/20120820/d97ab54d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mime-attachment.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 47196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://areciboscience.org/pipermail/asapmembers_areciboscience.org/attachments/20120820/d97ab54d/attachment.jpeg>
More information about the asapmembers
mailing list